GENEVA: In Switzerland, a big change is on the horizon for assisted dying as The Last Resort organisation considering plans to introduce the Sarco capsule. This futuristic-looking, portable suicide pod is designed to help people end their lives peacefully by reducing oxygen through nitrogen deprivation. Costing $20 per use, it aims to provide a dignified and autonomous end-of-life option.
What Is the Sarco Capsule?
The Sarco capsule is a controversial device designed to offer a peaceful and painless death for those who choose to end their lives. Created by Australian euthanasia advocate Dr. Philip Nitschke, it stands out for its sleek, futuristic design and its purpose.
Developed over 12 years in the Netherlands at a cost of more than $710,000, the Sarco represents a major investment in both research and design. Despite the high initial cost, future versions are expected to be more affordable.
The Sarco capsule works by allowing the user to lie down comfortably inside. Once activated, the capsule quickly reduces oxygen levels, leading to euphoria and loss of consciousness within moments. The process is monitored for oxygen levels, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation to ensure a controlled and peaceful passing. It’s designed to be painless and irreversible, offering a humane alternative to traditional euthanasia methods.
Also read: UAE Rain Enhancement Programme explores new research collaborations in the US
In Switzerland, assisted suicide has been legal since 1942, provided there are no selfish motives. To use the Sarco, individuals must pass a mental capacity assessment, enter the capsule, answer automated questions, and press a button to start the process. Supporters argue it provides autonomy and a peaceful end-of-life choice.
The Sarco’s introduction has sparked debate in Switzerland, particularly regarding its legality and ethics. Some cantons have expressed reservations or banned it outright, but advocates argue it complies with existing laws and offers a non-medicalised alternative to traditional assisted dying methods. Ethical debates focus on individual rights and reducing suffering, while critics worry about potential misuse, the impact on vulnerable populations, and the societal implications of normalising such technologies.
(This article is published under a mutual content partnership arrangement between The Brew News and The Free Press Journal)
