The Meta youth safety trial has begun in California, testing claims that Facebook and Instagram harmed young users through addictive platform design.

OAKLAND: The Meta youth safety trial has opened in a US federal court in California, putting Facebook and Instagram under scrutiny over allegations that their platforms were deliberately designed to encourage compulsive use among children and teenagers.

The case brings together claims from 29 US states, with California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey leading the trial. The states allege that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to keep young people engaged while misleading the public about safety and improperly collecting data from some children under 13. Meta denies the allegations.

The proceedings are expected to run for several weeks and could become one of the most significant legal tests yet for social media companies facing growing scrutiny over children’s online safety.

At the centre of the dispute is how popular social platforms are designed. The states argue that features intended to boost engagement can encourage excessive use among younger audiences. Meta has rejected claims that its platforms are addictive and disputes that there is a clear causal link between social media use and poor adolescent wellbeing.

The Meta youth safety trial could also have consequences beyond financial penalties. The states are seeking changes that could affect how Facebook and Instagram operate, including stronger protections for younger users. Meta has previously said the potential penalties sought by four states could reach as much as $1.4 trillion, although the company disputes the basis for that figure.

The case comes amid a wider wave of litigation involving social media companies in the US. Meta, Google’s YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat have faced thousands of claims alleging that platform designs encouraged addictive behaviour among young people.

Attention will also focus on testimony from senior Meta figures. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram chief Adam Mosseri are expected to testify during the proceedings, according to Reuters. The jury’s findings will be advisory, with US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ultimately responsible for deciding the case.

Meta’s defence is expected to emphasise the safety measures and protections it says it has introduced for younger users while challenging the states’ interpretation of its internal research and platform design.

Impact to expect

The Meta youth safety trial could accelerate pressure on social media companies to strengthen age protections, parental controls and safeguards around features designed to increase engagement. A ruling requiring substantial changes could influence how major platforms approach young users well beyond the United States.

The outcome could therefore become an important benchmark for technology regulation, particularly as governments worldwide consider tougher rules around children’s access to social media and online safety.

Source – Agencies